EFEKTIVITAS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KONTEKSTUAL DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MATERI BIOTEKNOLOGI DI SMA NEGERI CIANJUR

Authors

Keywords:

Effectiveness, Learning Model, CTL

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of learning CTL (Contextual Teaching and Learning) on the matter of biotechnology, namely making nata de coco. The method used is the method of quasi-experimental research subjects students take one SMAN in Cianjur. The study used a descriptive analytic techniques. The effectiveness of learning is determined based on the following criteria: 1) the significance of the thoroughness of learning outcomes, in terms of mastery of concepts is achieved; 2) the ability of inquiry indicated during PBM; 3) interaction pattern formed during PBM, namely the interaction patterns are symmetrical, asymmetrical shifting, and asymmetrical, adapted from Johnson & Johnson (1975). From these results it is found that it turns learning model is effective with the fact that support, namely: 1) The study results turned out to be significantly better than the complete learning criteria (Zscore = 5.69); 2) the ability of scientific inquiry at all emerges with the ability greatest scientific investigations (24.45%) and the lowest in the ability to develop descriptions, explanations, predictions and models based on evidence (10.70%); 3) interaction pattern formed is symmetrical patterns of interaction (50.72%) and the shifting asymmetric (49.36).

References

Ariasian, P.W. 1994. Classroom Assessment. New York: MC.Millan.

Burgess, H. (----), Problem Based Learning. SWAPltsn. Tersedia [online] di http//:www.udel.edu. 5 Maret 2003.

Direktorat Pendidikan Lanjutan Pertama. 2002. Pendekatan Kontekstual. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Direktorat Pendidikan Lanjutan Pertama. 2003. Biologi. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Duch, B. J. 1995. What is Problem Based Learning? Newsletter of the Center for Teaching Effectiveness. Tersedia [online] di http//:www.udel.edu. 5 Maret 2003.

Gunstone, R., Mc Kittrick, B. & Marshall, P. 2002. Structured Cognitive Disscusion in Senior High School, Student and Teacher Perceptions.

Imel, Susan. 2000. Contextual Learning in Adult Education. Tersedia [online] di http//:www.udel.edu. 5 Maret 2003.

Isa, M. 1996. Perbandingan Basil Belajar Siswa dengan Cara Pemetaan Konsep melalui Kelompok dan Kerja Mandiri dalam mata pelajaran Fisika. Skripsi Jurusan Pendidikan Fisika FPMIPA IKIP Bandung: Tidak diterbitkan.

Kelly, Gregory J. dan Crawford, Teresa. 1993. Analysis of Discourse in Small Laboratory Groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.

Lie, A. 2002. Cooperative Learning. Mempraktekan Cooperative Learning di Ruang Kelas. Jakarta: P.T. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

Nasution, S. 1982. Metode Research. Bandung: Jemmars Bandung.

National Research Council. 1996. National Science Education Standars. Washington: National Academy Press.

Novak, J. dan Gowing, D. (1985). Learning How to Learn. London: Canmbridge University Press.

Peterson, M. (----). Skills to Enhance Problem-Based Learning. Tersedia [online] di http//:www.udel.edu.5 Maret 2003.

Pusat Kurikulum. 2001. Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi Mata Pelajaran Biologi. Jakarta: Pusat Kurikulum Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Reichel, Anne Grall. 1994. Performance Assessment: Five Provtical Approach. Journal Schience of Children.

Rhem, J., (----). Problem-Based Learning: An Introduction. Tersedia [online] di http//:www.udel.edu. 5 Maret 2003.

Roth, Wolf, M. dan Rocyhoudhury, A. 1992. The Social Construction of Scientific Concept or Concept Map as Conception Device and Tool for Social Thinkingin School Science, Science Education.786:5.5312-5557.

Rocyhoudhury, A. dan Roth, W. M. 1996. Interaction in an Open Inquiry Physics Laboratory. International Journal of Science Education.

Rowe, M.B. 1918. Teaching Science as Continous Inquiry. New York: McGraw-HillBookCompany.

Rustaman, N. 1995. Pengembangan butir Soal Keterampilan Proses Sains. Jurusan Pendidikan Biologi FPMIPA IKIP Bandung: Tidak diterbitkan.

Sardiman, A.M. 2001. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Schmuck, Richard, A. dan Schmuck, Patricia A. 1979. Group Process in The Classrom, Iowa: W.M.C. Brown Company.

Shepardson, Daniel, D. 1996. Social Interaction and The Mediation of Science Learning in Two Snakk Group of First Grader. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Chicago: Rand McBNally.

Sund, R.B. & Thowbridge, L.W. 1975. Teaching Science by Inquiry in The Secondary School. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrit Publishing Company.

Suparno, Paul. 1997. Teori Perkembangan K-ognitif Piaget. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Suratno, T. 2002. Kajian Pola Interaksi Siswa sela kegiatan Praktikum Uji Makanan. Skripsi Jurusan Pendidikan Biologi FPMIPA UPI: Tidak diterbitkan.

Wadsworth, Barry, J. 1984. Piaget's Theory of Cognitive and Affictive Development. New York: Longman.

Woolfolk, A. Nita E. 1995. Educational Psychology. Boston: Allen & Bacon.

Yellon, Stephen L. dan Weinstein, Grace W. 1980. A Teacher's World: Psychology in the Classroom. New York: Prentice-Hal

Downloads

Published

2016-12-18

How to Cite

Aripin, A. S. (2016). EFEKTIVITAS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KONTEKSTUAL DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MATERI BIOTEKNOLOGI DI SMA NEGERI CIANJUR. JRPA - Journal of Regional Public Administration, 1(1), 94–106. Retrieved from https://ejournal.lppmunsap.org/index.php/jrpa/article/view/938